Rahpooye Honar/Performing Arts

Rahpooye Honar/Performing Arts

The Subject’s Rupture from the Signifying Chain in the Psychotic Structure: A Lacanian Reading of Amir Naderi’s Requiem (1978)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master Student of Cinema, Department of Cinema, Faculty of Cinema and Theatre, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Cinema, Faculty of Cinema and Theatre, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
This study aims to provide a psychoanalytic reading of the subject's predicament in the film Requiem (directed by Amir Naderi, 1978), employing the concepts of psychosis and melancholia metaphorically through Jacques Lacan’s theoretical framework. This film belongs to the Iranian New Wave cinema of the 1960s and 1970s—a movement characterized by its innovative and experimental tendencies, often reflecting contemporary social issues through forms of critical realism. In the film, the main character, after serving eight years in prison, is unable to reintegrate into society or, in Lacanian terms, re-establish his position within the Symbolic order as a linguistic structure, undergoing a psychotic rupture from the signifying chain. The aim of this study is to demonstrate how, due to the absence of familial and social bonds, he emerges as a quasi-psychotic subject and represents a melancholic experience as disorientation and wandering through the city. To illuminate the psychoanalytic dimensions of the central character's predicament in Requiem, a foundational understanding of these disorders is essential, bridging the film's metaphorical layers with Lacanian theory. This theoretical groundwork reveals how structural disruptions underpin the subject's estrangement. Psychosis and melancholia have often been conceptualized as pathological phenomena. Classical psychoanalysis associates psychosis with a fundamental change in the understanding of reality, while Lacanian theory sees it as arising from a disruption in the functioning of language and signification. This disruption leads to a failure of stabilization in the symbolic order, conceived as a dimension of the social order. Drawing on the perspectives of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan, melancholia typically occurs within the psychotic structure: Freud associates it with the loss of an object, while Lacan emphasizes its connection to the collapse of the symbolic order and the over-proximity to the objet petit a. Few, if any, studies have examined psychosis and melancholia from a Lacanian lens in Iranian cinema. Therefore, the significance of the study lies in addressing the aforementioned psychoanalytic concepts in Iranian cinema and exploring a condition reflecting the human experience of wandering and instability in the world. The present study employs a descriptive-analytical method, drawing on data collected through film observation and consultation of library and electronic sources. The study designates the film Requiem (directed by Amir Naderi in 1978) as its case study, with the aim of offering a psychoanalytic reading of the main character's individual and social condition, and in this way, it metaphorically examines his experience of psychosis, rupture from the signifying chain, and melancholia. The theoretical framework is grounded in the approach of Jacques Lacan; in the study's theoretical foundations section, these concepts are explored alongside other fundamental components of Lacanian thought, such as the subject’s relation to the Name-of-the-Father as the primordial signifier, language and the triple division of the Symbolic, the Imaginary, and the Real, the objet petit a, desire, and the Other. The film analysis employs a textual method, examining the narrative structure and arrangement, modes of characterization, and representational forms to elucidate the subject's interaction and conflict with the space depicted in the film. The findings of the present study indicate that in Requiem, the main character, Nasrollah, on the threshold of his release from prison—which functions as a liminal space between past and present—attempts to reintegrate into the city and everyday life; yet, deprived of familial and social support, he becomes disoriented and is left to wander aimlessly. From a historical and sociological perspective, Iran during this period was subjected to contradictory modernization policies of the ruling regime, which engendered deep socio-economic dualities that profoundly influenced the symbolic fabric of daily life and interpersonal relations among the populace. Consequently, Nasrollah is relegated to the margins of the symbolic order within such a context. This condition can be interpreted through Lacanian theory, insofar as his estrangement and disaffiliation from society position him as a subject suffering from a rupture in his relation to the signifying chain, severed from the stabilizing signifiers anchoring the symbolic order and, hence, from the Other. In this regard, the absence of the Name-of-the-Father—as the foreclosure of the primordial signifier—or the loss of a coherent kinship structure as a foundational support functions as a metaphor for a hole, in a Lacanian sense, at the level of the symbolic order and signification, rendering the main character incapable of reconstructing his position within this order and thereby consigning him to a psychotic structure. The confrontation with his mother’s death, the final familial referent, exacerbates this collapse. In her absence, the only familial remnants—his father's mementos, namely a rifle and a target board—come to function as metaphorical traces of Lacanian objet petit a. Objet a, emblematic of a structural lack, operates as the cause of desire and is incessantly displaced onto other objects. Yet, in the film, these items constitute Nasrollah's sole anchors for signifying action and economic subsistence, thereby remaining irreplaceable. The rifle and the target board fail to stabilize his position in the socio-symbolic order; thus, Nasrollah persists in a state of lack. This psychic condition is further echoed in the film's formal structure. The filmmaker's camera persistently captures the main character's disorientation amid urban and peripheral mise-en-scènes through fragmented shots, thereby depicting an experience that is at once individual and social. This not only underscores the plight of a marginalized subject in Iran's developing society but also, from a psychoanalytic standpoint, reflects the subject's rupture from the signifying chain, situating him at a liminal surface between the imaginary, symbolic, and real orders. Moreover, the film features a character named Luti, who possesses an animal that he regards as his own child. Nasrollah establishes a connection with Luti, who, in a metaphorical sense, functions as a surrogate for the primordial signifier; however, Luti, too, perishes. Consequently, the main character's futile attempts to reconstitute relational bonds, coupled with his over-proximity to the objet petit a, ensnare him in a cycle of repetition, jouissance, and melancholic experience. At the end of the film, the subject's melancholic experience intensifies: he sells the rifle and the board and spends the meager sum he obtains on getting drunk. Nasrollah reemerges in the city, where the streets envelop him in a state of drunkenness and aimless wandering, a condition that can be read as metaphorically resembling the Lacanian real—that is, the domain of the impossible. Amir Naderi’s Requiem (1978), a film belonging to the Iranian New Wave cinema, offers a profound insight into the structural ruptures that mark its historical moment and shape the film’s narrative organization. A metaphorical reading of Requiem suggests that the story of Nasrollah—the recently released prisoner and central figure—operates simultaneously on a psychoanalytic plane and carries structural significance. This psychoanalytic dimension is articulated through the concepts of psychosis and melancholia. Drawing on Lacanian theory and proposing a conceptual framework for these conditions, the present study reads the main character’s individual–social disjunction as a disruption in the signifying chain and identifies its constitutive components within the filmic text. The findings demonstrate that Nasrollah emerges as a fragile subject upon encountering the external world, a fragility initially manifested in the experience of the father’s absence and the confrontation with the mother’s death. The persistence of loss subsequently intensifies in the absence of integration into the symbolic order, drawing the subject toward the objet petit a as its structural lack. Consequently, the narrative structure, characterization, and formal strategies—such as the use of urban mise-en-scène—not only reflect the fragmented historical conditions but also trace the trajectory of the character’s wandering and disintegration as a metaphor for psychosis and the progression toward a melancholic experience. Ultimately, this Lacanian perspective illuminates the significance of the film Requiem for examining psychic rupture at the individual level and in relation to transitional societies, paving the way for future analyses of Iranian cinema through psychoanalytic concepts such as psychosis and melancholia.
Keywords
Subjects

  -            احمدی ‌فر، سید امیرسینا (۱۴۰۰). تعویق میل در روابط مادر و فرزند: خوانشی لاکانی از باغ‌وحش شیشه‌ای اثر تنسی ویلیامز و قوی سیاه اثر دارن آرونوفسکی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی دکتر علی شریعتی، مشهد.
  -            اکبری، مهرداد (۱۳۹۹). واکاوی نقش‌مایۀ درون‌مایه‌ای بیگانگی در سینمای پل تامس اندرسن با تأکید بر آراء ژاک لکان، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه سوره، دانشکدۀ هنر، تهران.
  -            آبراهامیان، یرواند (1384). ایران بین دو انقلاب. ترجمه احمد گل‌ محمدی و محمدابراهیم فتاحی، تهران: نشر نی.
  -            آقابابایی، احسان (۱۳۹۱). سوژه، میل و ایدئولوژی (مطالعه موردی پنج فیلم سینمای ایران در دهه‌های چهل و پنجاه، رساله دکتری تخصصی، دانشگاه اصفهان، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، اصفهان.
  -            ژیژک، اسلاوی (1389). عینیت ایدئولوژی. ترجمه علی بهروزی. تهران: نشر طرح نو.
  -            فروید، زیگموند (1382). ماتم و ماخولیا. ترجمه مراد فرهادپور. ارغنون، شماره 21، بهار. صص 83-101
  -            فینک، بروس (1402). سوژۀ لاکانی بین زبان و ژوئیسانس. ترجمه محمدعلی جعفری. تهران: نشر ققنوس.
  -            کسراییان، بیژن (1400). زیباشناسی موج‌نوی سینمای ایران: واکاوی دسته‌بندی‌های سبکی و زیباشناسانه موج‌نوی سینمای ایران و ارتباط با ادبیات و هنر نوگرای ایران. نامه هنرهای نمایشی و موسیقی، 12(24)، صص 47-63
  -            لکان، ژاک (1402). سمینار ژاک لکان، کتاب سوم: روان‌پریشی (1955-1956) (ژاک-آلن میلر، ویراستار فرانسوی). ترجمه رضا سویزی و تورج بنی‌رستم. تهران: نشره گستره.
  -            لاکان، ژاک (1397). اضطراب: دفتر سوم: شکل‌های ابژۀ  a(ژاک آلن‌-میلر، ویراستار فرانسوی و سهیلا خداوردیان، ویراستار فارسی). ترجمه صبا راستگار. تهران: نشر پندار تابان.
  -            مک گاون، تاد؛ کانکل، شیلا (1402). لکان و فیلم معاصر. ترجمه نیکا خمسی. تهران: نشر نگاه.
  -            مهرابی، مسعود (1371). تاریخ سینمای ایران از آغاز تا سال 1357. تهران: نشر ماهنامۀ سینمایی فیلم.
 
 
          -            Abrahamian, Ervand. (2005). Iran between two revolutions, translated by Ahmad Golmohammadi and Mohammad Ebrahim Fattahi, Tehran: Ney Publishing House. [in Persian]
          -            Aghababaei, Ehsan. (2012). Subject, Desire, and Ideology (A Case Study of Five Iranian Films from the 1960s and 1970s) (Doctoral dissertation). University of Isfahan, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Isfahan. [in Persian]
          -            Ahmadifar, Seyyed Amirsina. (2021). Deferral of Desire in Mother-Child Relationships: A Lacanian Study of Tennessee  Williams’ The Glass Menagerie and Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan (Master’s Thesis). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of literatures & human sciences of Ali Shariati, Mashhad. [in Persian]
          -            Akbari, Mehrdad. (2020). An Analysis of the Thematic Motif of Alienation in Paul Thomas Anderson's Cinema with focus on Jacques Lacan’s Ideas (Master’s Thesis). Soore University, Faculty of Art, Tehran. [in Persian]
          -            Berger, B. (1996). A sense of orders: An introduction to the theory of Jacques Lacan. In J. R Brandell (Ed.),  Narration and therapeutic action (pp. 83-98). The Haworth Press. [Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2024]
          -            Braunstein, N. (2015). You cannot choose to go crazy. In P Gherovici. , & M Steinkoler (Eds.), Lacan on madness (pp. 85-98). Routledge.
          -            Brenner, L. S. (2023). Excessive creativity in melancholia. In D Hook., & S Vanheule (Eds.), Lacan on depression and melancholia (pp. 137-156). Routledge.
          -            Chiesa, L. (2007). Subjectivity and otherness: A philosophical reading of Lacan. MIT press.
          -            Dana, G. (2015). From psychotic illness to psychotic existence: On re-inventing the institution. In . In P Gherovici. , & M Steinkoler (Eds.), Lacan on madness (pp. 47-55). Routledge.
          -            De Luca Picione, R. (2024). Jacques Lacan’s liminal subject: Semiotic and anti-semiotic thrusts of a psychoanalytic theory of the subjectivity. In S. H Klempe., & A Madill (Eds.), French psychoanalysis revisited (pp. 13-31). Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68534-7
          -            Fink, Bruce. (2023). The Lacanian subject: Between language and Jouissance, translated by Mohammad Ali Jafari, Tehran: Qoqnoos Publishing House. [in Persian]
          -            Freud, Sigmund. (2003). Mourning and melancholia, translated by Morad Farhadpour, Arghanoon, no. 21, Spring, pp. 83–101. [in Persian]
          -            Greenshields, W. (2017). Writing the structures of the subject: Lacan and topology. Palgrave Macmillan.
          -            Grigg, R. (2023). Forgetting and remembering. In D Hook., & S Vanheule (Eds.), Lacan on depression and melancholia (pp. 41-47). Routledge.
          -            Grigg, R. (2015). Melancholia and the unabandoned object. In P Gherovici., & M Steinkoler (Eds.), Lacan on madness (pp. 139-158). Routledge.
          -            Hook, D., & Vanheule, S. (2023). Lacan on Depression and Melancholia. Routledge.
          -            Hook, D. (2023). The complex of melancholia. In D Hook., & S Vanheule (Eds.), Lacan on depression and melancholia (pp. 104-119). Routledge.
          -            Hook, D. (2018). Melancholic psychosis—A Lacanian approach. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 28(4), 466-480.
          -            Kasraian, Bijan. (2021). Aesthetics of the new wave of Iranian cinema: Analysis of Stylistic and Aesthetic Categories of the New Wave of Iranian Cinema and its Relationship with Modern Iranian Literature and Art, Journal of Dramatic Arts & Music (Nameh-ye Honarhā-ye Namāyeshi va Musiqi), 12(24), pp. 47-63. [in Persian] doi:10.30480/dam.2021.1440.1337
          -            Lacan, Jacques. (2023). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book III – The psychoses (J.-A. Miller, ed.), translated by Reza Soveizi and Touraj Bani-Rostam, Tehran: Gostareh Publishing House. [in Persian]
          -            Lacan, Jacques. (2018). Anxiety: The seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book X: The five forms of the object a (J.-A. Miller, French editor; Soheila Khodaverdian, Persian editor), translated by Saba Rastgar, Tehran: Pendar-e Taban Publishing House. [in Persian]
          -            Lacan, J. (2014). Anxiety: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book X (J.A. Miller, Ed. & A. R. Price, Trans.). Polity Press.
          -            Lacan, J. (1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI (J.A. Miller, Ed. & A. Sheridan, Trans.). W.W. Norton & Company.
          -            Lacan, J. (1992). The ethics of psychoanalysis 1959-1960: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII (J.A. Miller, Ed. & D. Porter, Trans.). W.W. Norton & Company.
          -            Madill, A. (2024). Bela Lugosi’s haunted mirror: Spontaneous deployment of Lacanian concepts in rending paranormal experiences. In S. H Klempe., & A Madill (Eds.), French psychoanalysis revisited (pp. 33-52). Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68534-7
          -            McGowan, Todd., & Kunkle, Sheila. (2023). Lacan and contemporary film, translated by Nika Khamsi, Tehran: Negah Publishing House. [in Persian]
          -            Mehrabi, Massoud. (1992). The History of Iranian Cinema. Tehran: Film Monthly Magazine Publishing. [in Persian]
          -            Quinet, A. (1995). The Gaze As An Object. In R Feldstein., & B Fink., & M Jaanus (Eds.), Reading seminar XI: Lacan's four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (pp. 139-147). SUNY Press.
          -            Sheridan, A. (2005). Translator’s note. In J Lacan. Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Routledge.
          -            Vanheule, S. (2017). Conceptualizing and treating psychosis: A Lacanian perspective: Conceptualizing and Treating Psychosis. British Journal of Psychotherapy33(3), 388-398.
          -            Žižek, Slavoj. (2010). The Sublime Object of Ideology, translated by Ali Behroozi, Tehran: Tarh-e No Publishing House. [in Persian]

  • Receive Date 06 September 2025
  • Revise Date 10 October 2025
  • Accept Date 14 October 2025